Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Road of Death's Bad-Ass Bus

"The only safe way to move troops and diplomats" along the deadliest stretch of road in Iraq "is in convoys of custom-made $275,000 armored buses," Defense News says.
labrock220.jpg

The buses, called "Rhinos," look like something out of The Road Warrior... They roll in the dead of night, escorted by armored Humvees, with the road sealed to all other traffic and AH-64 Apache gunships loitering overhead.

The Rhino is all flat slabs of gray or off-white steel (there are two models in service) with passenger windows angled in streamlined fashion, like an old-time Greyhound bus, as the only concession to aesthetics.

The beauty of these buses is not in their graceful lines — they are as graceful as a refrigerator. Rather, their attractiveness lies in the armor, which covers the sides, tops and bottoms of the five buses in service in Baghdad. Twenty-six passengers ride in relative comfort on functional — if not stylish — vinyl seats.

The buses, each weighing about 13 tons and featuring bullet-resistant glass and 12 gun ports along with all that armor, are manufactured by Weston, Fla.-based Labock Technologies at the company’s plant in Ashdod, Israel.

Until three months ago, the only safe ways to move diplomats, contractors and others working for the government between the airport and the Green Zone [along "Route Irish" aka "the Road of Death" -- ed.] was by Rhino or helicopter. Now, the helicopters are being used elsewhere, and the only remaining safe ride is on the Rhino...

About three months ago, a Rhino took a direct hit from a rocket-propelled grenade. "Nobody was hurt except for some minor bumps and bruises," said Army Maj. Sharon Smith, of the Joint Area Support Group, who books the Rhino convoys.

Rhino maker Labock also claims that "it was the vehicle of choice employed by the military to provide safe ground transportation for the U.S. Secretary of Defense, Mr. Donald Rumsfeld, and General Dick Myers and his staff while they were visiting Baghdad in may 2004. It is also the vehicle of choice to drive Saddam Hussein and other V.I.P. prisoners between their confinements and the Iraqi Tribunal."

THERE'S MORE: For first-hand accounts of folks who've ridden the bus on the Route of Death, check out the comments section.

Latest Comments

Does anyone have the specs on the Rhino, more to the point, the armor? The vehicle has supposedly taken RPG (RPG-7?) hits and lived to tell about it. That's hard to believe considering nothing short of extesive use of ceramics, slat armor, ERA or ADS would stop an RPG-7 attack. The picture above depictes the Rino as a fairly thin-skined looking vehicle. It's not that RPG-7 protection couldn't be given to the thing, but why? What is the Rhino's mission BTW?

"Until three months ago, the only safe ways [Rhino] to move diplomats, contractors and others working for the government between the airport and the Green Zone..."

"The buses, each weighing about 13 tons and featuring bullet-resistant glass and 12 gun ports..."

Diplomats and contractors need gun ports? I don't get it.

I assume the Rino is not designed to replace a more heavily armored APC, but apperently to suppliment them by taking over some of the less strenious tasks. I highly doubt the US will be ferring any of it troops into front line combat in Rhinos. LIC (low intensity conflict) in urban terrain is a whole new ball game for the US and it's no surprise that they are turning to the Israelis for adivce/hardware (come on they've literaly had decades worth of experince in LIC). BTW, the Israelis have something similar to it, the Wolf and their "Rhino": http://www.israeli-weapons.com/israeli_weapons_vehicles_light-combat.html

It's my belief that we will begin to see family(s) of specialized vehicles for LIC in urban terrain. Vehicles that are so mission-specific that they will look rather odd when placed aside a AFV such as a Bradley or similar vehicle for two reasons:

1. one the vehicles are built to satisfy a different criteria (IE: different mission, or to better fulfill similar mission)

2. they're like nothing else in the US arsenal. the US has little experence in LIC in recent years and has had to get by with exisiting vehicles in it's inventory by thrusting them into situations that the vehicles may not have been designed for, or excell at.

Comparing two different vehicles,designed for different missions, and saying vehicle XXX1 is better or worse than vehicle XXX2 without comparing missions is just silly.

Posted by: Daren at March 16, 2006 3:36 AM


can anyone tell me how much $$$ is costs to get a ride from the IZ to BIAP? Is it easy to catch a ride on it?

Posted by: Operator at January 9, 2006 10:47 AM


You are correct Connor.
US 1st and 29th Divisions together suffered around 2000 casualties at Omaha Beach.
One day=2000
3 years=2000
If people want to debate the war and politics at least make sure you actually know what your talking about!!! you're obviously connected to the internet so put it to good use and google the issues!
On the subject of the bus:
I think the rhino is very cool and I would feel safe driving on one (I may even get to as I am a photojournalist) but I would still prefer an APC. As for the troops I think between the upgraded humvees, M113's and M2 Bradley IFV's they are pretty well covered (though the millitary has got to stop transporting people in those flatbed trucks-IED and RPG magnet)

Posted by: Mariposa at November 28, 2005 7:51 PM


I rode around in a soft-skinned humvee minus doors wearing vietnam-era body armor in summer 2003. Now I have brand new body armor (hell, they just gave us new and improved plates...again!) and all the hmmwvs that leave the base have all the armor the powertrain can take, and then some. We spend tons of money replacing trannies on these things cause of all the armor plating. Would people quit whining and complaining about "Why don't the soldiers get to ride the bus"? How about "Because it can't shoot back"? We're so much better protected now than we were 2.5 years ago!

Oh, and in case you missed it, the death toll just hit 2000. That's fewer than two per day. One of them was my commo guy a few months ago, but 2000 casualties in almost 3 years? That's incredibly low, when you think about it. That's, what, an afternoon's worth in some past wars.

Posted by: Connor at October 26, 2005 11:17 AM


I can't believe all the fuss about why "only diplomats and contactors" get to ride "the bus". First of all, that isn't true. Anyone going in the same direction can get a ride, if there's room. How many "diplomats and contractors" do you think ride the "bus route" on a nightly basis? Get real, State Department personnel might have priority, but they're a tiny minority of bus passengers.

Second, there's the question of numbers. We own five rhinos. There are tens of thousands of soldiers in Baghdad...hmmmm....

Okay, look at the two methods of travel used by soldiers, helicopter and humvee. Well, it's been a while since a helicopter got shot down, so I imagine that's a bit safer than the rhino. And what's wrong with a soldier on his way back from leave getting a ride in a humvee? Isn't that what he does on a daily basis anyway? Ride around Baghdad in a Humvee?

Posted by: Baghdaddy at October 26, 2005 11:07 AM


» View All 85 Comments

» Post a Comment