Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Mini-Sensors for "Military Omniscience"

clens_hand_only.JPGSpotting insurgents, sorting out friend from foe – it's beyond tough in today’s guerilla war zones. So tough, that no single monitor can be counted on to handle the job. The Pentagon's answer: build a set of palm-sized, networked sensors that can be scattered around, and work together to “detect, classify, localize, and track dismounted combatants under foliage and in urban environments.” It’s part of a larger Defense Department effort to establish “military omniscience” and “ubiquitous monitoring.”

The military has been working on gadgets for a while, now, that can be left behind in a bad neighborhood or a jihadist training site, and monitor the situation. These Camouflaged Long Endurance Nano-Sensors (CLENS) would be an order of magnitude smaller than previous surveillance gear of its type -- just 60 milimeters long, and 150 grams.

Darpa, the Pentagon's far-out research arm, also wants the monitors to take up a 10,000th of the power of previous sensors. That would give the CLENS enough juice to keep watch over an area for up to 180 days.

clens_diagram.JPGThe way they'd keep watch would be different, too. Not as a individual sensors, but as a network of monitors, communicating with ultra wideband radios. The same frequencies could be used as a kind of radar, to track objects and people within the sensor net.

"The best way to learn about an adversary – what he’s done, what he’s doing, and what he’s likely to do - is through continual observation using as many observation mechanisms as possible. We call this persistent surveillance," Dr. Ted Bially, head of Darpa's Information Exploitation Office, told a conference last year. "We’ve learned that occasional or periodic snapshots don’t tell us enough of what we need to know. In order to really understand what’s going on we have to observe our adversaries and their environment 24 hours a day, seven days a week, week-in and week-out."

According to its recently-released budget, Darpa hopes to hand over its new, minature, persistent sensors to Special Operations Command by the end of fiscal year 2007.

UPDATE 8:50 AM: Speaking of military omniscience, Darpa's "Combat Zones That See" effort, meant to network together an entire city's worth of surveillance cameras, gets $5 million in next year's budget.

Latest Comments

hey how cheap are these and where can i get them need to know asap

Posted by: amak at January 12, 2007 8:39 PM


Neat technology and glad to see it being used and effective. Noted the comments about REMBASS and offer some unattended sensor history for anyone interested.

It began with formation of a combined DoD Group and JTF in late 1966 to design, acquire and deploy unattended acoustic and seismic sensors along the DMZ and Ho Chi Minh Trail. The concept being to construct a ground infiltration detection system analog to the underwater submarine acoustic detection system.

The first sensors were deployed in less than a year. They were dropped from Phantom Jets; the acoustic sensors had chutes to slow them and hang them in trees; the seismic sensors dug into the ground to detect vehicle or foot traffic. Detections were transmitted to aircraft which relayed to a central point. Later, sensors were monitored from high ground for use in country in local areas. The groupings of sensors with a local monitoring site was called BASS (Battle Area Surveilance System) and was the progenitor of the Army REMBASS.

The Dod group was disbanded in 1972 and its products and technology transistioned to the Services. Besides a variety (sizes & shapes) of hand-emplaced and air-dropped acoustic and seismic sensors, there were magnetic and infrared sensors, night vision and starlight devices, and even a couple of foliage penetrating radars. One of the last items was a number of very small seismic sensors and a monitor for patrols to use for local intrusion warning.

A lot of technology was developed and deployed in a short time. The Group/JTF had Army,Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps members as well as civilians from DoD, Sandia and Mitre.

Posted by: Gene F at April 27, 2006 3:46 PM


These things are certainly real. We were pitching the thing way back as the ELASTIC project, complete with the sneaky-wave comm links and motion locator feature.

To the guys saying it's too small to have a lot of battery storage, that's probably correct. However, sneaky-wave (the old name, now it's UWB) is spectacularly efficient in terms of power-to-range. There's a huge number of advantages to sneaky-wave in a gadget like this, not only is the power drain just a few milliWatts, the sensors can determine each others' relative locations to a few millimeters, they can locate (and size) objects in the field between them, and the comm signal is effectively encrypted, although it might be more accurate to call it "non-observable", since you can't detect its presence with any sort of emission-spotting device.

There's a lot you can do with this sort of thing, we had also pitched a sort of transparent super-ball looking version that you could just chunk out of your ruck as you went, with vibration sensors, audio and video inputs etc that would solar charge and transmit back only if something met a profile or if they were interrogated from a UAV. With enough of them in a network, you can do some data fusion and get a really good picture of what's going on in the area.

Posted by: erewhon at April 17, 2006 3:04 PM


Good Morning Folks,

It looks like these remote sensors have scored their first "Kill" on an IED laying crew in Iraq.

The sensors found 'em and an armed Preditor in the neighborhood got 'em. The next level now will be to mate these bad boys/girls with the Northorp Grumman "Autonomous Killer Bees".

To the crew at Nellis, good work, outstanding and well done. Now off to the Casinos.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Posted by: Byron Skinner at March 30, 2006 1:42 PM


PJ, I have always wanted to say thankyou as well as other staffs from bottom of my heart for you and the staffs contribution of UGS, saving lives. Without your contribution and efforts, as well as those who have worked on the project, we would have less options in low intensity conflicts, and close range combats. I thought about the concept years ago without knowing REMBASS, and was surprised one day to notice some one had come up with the same idea more than decades ago. You are our hero. Sensors are not exciting as weapons to some people, but I have always been one of the geeks who loved to know more about sensors. They don't attack, but provide valuable information. Without sensors, there is no future of Information Technology. Sometimes they may save lives, and avoid harm to innocent. I hope the milestone of REMBASS will continue to lead to be bulit up on it for better systems, saving more lives. Even we may pass away some day, our systems will continue to live.

Posted by: pedestrian at March 30, 2006 11:43 AM


» View All 20 Comments

» Post a Comment