Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Now You See Me...

It sounds like something out of a comic book, or Lord of the Rings, I know. But there's a chance that invisibility – real-life, honest-to-God invisibility – may actually be possible, some day.

The technology doesn’t come from some dubious unknown inventor, but from Professor Sir John Pendry, the legendary theoretical physicist, I write in this month’s BBC Focus magazine – “the world's best science and technology monthly.” Pendry has developed the concept of metamaterials, which have properties determined by their structure rather than their composition. This can give them 'impossible' properties, such as a negative refractive index. Initially, there was some debate about whether this could ever be achieved. But the proof came last year with the demonstration of a superlens capable of beating any lens made of normal material. Invis artic.JPG

By utilizing metamaterials, it should be possible, in theory, to create what Pendry calls an invisibility cloak -- although invisibility shell might be more accurate as it will need to be rigid. Such a cloak would divert any incident light around its surface and release it on the same path on the other side: to any observer the wearer is invisible.

Interestingly, Pendry’s work on metamaterials started when he was working for Marconi. He was looking at the application of carbon fiber for a stealth coating when he realized that its interaction with radar was determined by the length of the fibers – it was effectively acting as an array of tiny aerials – and that the same effect could have many other applications.

Invisibility in the optical spectrum will be challenging because metamaterials will need to be constructed on a scale corresponding to the wavelengths of visible light, which is just a few hundred nanometres. That technology will not be around for at least five years.

But radar invisibility is much easier because radar wavelengths are in the centimeter range. Pendry’s colleague, Dr. David R. Smith at Duke University, is already working on a microwave metamaterial. Results are expected within eighteen months.

Unlike existing stealth techniques, a metamaterial should in principle be able to make an aircraft (or missile) literally invisible to any radar from any aspect.

There are likely to be other metamaterials along later. As Pendry explained, they can have all sorts of mechanical or acoustic properties as well as affecting light or other radiation. But for the mean time, we are likely to have out hands full just thinking of applications for invisibility.

The biggest question is likely to be the width of spectrum that any given material can handle. According to Pendry, a sufficiently deep metamaterial should be able to cope with a very wide spectrum. This might include all visible wavelengths plus a chunk of infra-red and UV. However, it’s clear that even very limited invisibility could be a major military asset.

-- David Hambling

Latest Comments

So does this mean that an "invisible" infantryman would have to have a rigid suit, like a knight in invisible armor?

Posted by: BullJustin at March 6, 2007 10:34 AM


David...a broadband microwave version has already been fielded in 'special applications'.

This stuff has been called by various names over the past 15 years, it's a bit confusing to most as to where and how to find info on it.

'Metamaterial' is the proper name but for a long while we've been calling them 'left-handed magnetic materials'. If you poke around for it under that nomenclature you'll find a bunch of info on the zero-to-negative permeability metamaterials. The entire metamaterial effect is sort of groupable under plasmonic engineering - the intentional modification of the behaviors of electron clouds around atoms.

A left-handed magnetic coating can do quite a bit of the things you discussed in your article, although now they can also achieve negative or radically enhanced permittivities, which is a totally different kettle of fish.

Left-handed coatings can do a lot of freaky things, amongst which are inverse or static Dopplers. That is, the return from the craft exhibits no Doppler effect or even more unintuitively return a LOWER frequency as they increase in velocity relative to the radar.

There are many an application for these. Some of them you haven't mentioned yet.

Oh, btw, Phantomworks was the first to field.

Posted by: erewhon at September 9, 2006 1:18 PM


Far more practical methods will probably be fabrics embedded with nano circuits activating color changing dyes, or nano OLED's where small cameras view the environment cause a view of the surroundings to be displayed.

Even today, you could put something like a color e-ink material on a vehicle or aircraft and use a simple magnetic wand type mechanism (somewhat like a printer's print head) to change the camo on it immediately. Such an approach might be good for armored vehicles and the underside of UAV's.

Neither of these two cammo's won't be perfect, but are both near term and could provide considerably improved capabilities over today's "static" systems.

Posted by: reefdiver at September 9, 2006 12:12 PM


ok...that's just creepy...the idea of a pair of eyes being there without a body accompanying it just freaks me out for some reason...lol.

Posted by: DS at September 8, 2006 5:49 PM


About using the material as an anti-laser device - I suspect this won't work any better than mirroring the thing.
Both run into the issue that a high energy pulse may not be completly absorbed, but if enough is the mirror/invisible material loses its special properties and the follow-up pulses burn through.
This brings up another issue - how durable is this stuff? If the radar-invisible material is carbon fiber, that's pretty nice. But could you coat a missile or aircraft with all the stuff, or would the stuff that handles, say, visible light burn off a missile nose cone?

Posted by: Eric at September 8, 2006 5:35 PM


» View All 11 Comments

» Post a Comment