Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

"Deadlies" Nominee: Nuke Bazooka

Nominated by Steve Weintz

You can't have a contest to find the most hazardous equipment of all time without including the legendary Davy Crockett -- the tripod-mounted, atomic artillery launcher that inspired Starship Troopers' nuclear bazooka.

davy4.jpgThe Davy Crockett came in two flavors, 120mm and 155mm. Both used the same round -- an itty-bitty nuclear warhead, with a yield equal to "only" 10 to 20 tons of TNT (about what took down the Alfred R. Murrah Building in Oklahoma City). Maximum range was 2.5 miles for the bigger model, half that for the mini. Which meant that the Davy's three-man crew would survive the initial atomic blast. If they fired the shell perfectly, that is. Unfortunately, "both recoilless rifles proved to have poor accuracy in testing," Wikipedia notes.

But even if the Davy's crew managed to make it past the first few seconds of their weapon's firing, they still had to contend with the subsequent radiation. The minimum detonation range for the Davy was 1000 feet. The problem is, the explosion kicked off an "almost instantly lethal radiation dosage (in excess of 10,000 rem) within 500 feet (150 m), and a probably fatal dose (around 600 rem) within a quarter mile (400 meters)."

The Davy Crockett's warheads were tested twice, in 1962. 2,100 of the things were manufactured and deployed with American armed forces, until the Davy was retired in 1971.

Got an idea for a "Deadly?" E-mail or post your picks.

Latest Comments

An interesting article. One correction though - the explosive yield of the bomb used in Oklahoma was equivalent to no more than 5000lb of TNT, or roughly two tons. The Davey Crockett maximum yield was ten times this. Small nuclear weapons could be very effective, especially if used by insurgents in, say, Iraq or Afghanistan - or by terrorists in London, New York etc.

Posted by: Mark Evans at September 3, 2009 4:19 PM


An interesting article. One correction though - the explosive yield of the bomb used in Oklahoma was equivalent to no more than 5000lb of TNT, or roughly two tons. The Davey Crockett maximum yield was ten times this. Small nuclear weapons could be very effective, especially if used by insurgents in, say, Iraq or Afghanistan - or by terrorists in London, New York etc.

Posted by: Mark Evans at September 3, 2009 4:18 PM


An interesting article. One correction though - the explosive yield of the bomb used in Oklahoma was equivalent to no more than 5000lb of TNT, or roughly two tons. The Davey Crockett maximum yield was ten times this. Small nuclear weapons could be very effective, especially if used by insurgents in, say, Iraq or Afghanistan - or by terrorists in London, New York etc.

Posted by: Mark Evans at September 3, 2009 4:18 PM


It was real easy to see where it came from, I saw one fired with a conventional warhead in 63 at Fort Knox KY and the projectile looked as big as a watermelon flying thru the air and almost as slow.

Posted by: A Archer at February 23, 2008 8:11 PM


It was real easy to see where it came from, I saw one fired with conventional warhead in 63 at Fort Knox KY and the projectile looked as big as a watermelon flying thru the air and almost as slow.

Posted by: Arch at February 23, 2008 8:08 PM


» View All 12 Comments

» Post a Comment